Democrat leadership doesn't care if you die

Union-managed Healthcare for us (Private for them).
ACLU- and CAIR-devised security measures.
Lawyers for terrorists.
PC/ACLU lawfare control of our security.
A complete lack of any testicular fortitude (Hill has it, but it only against Pubs!).

York: Holder made call on Undiebomber

Byron York, one of the best reporters out there, points out the AG Eric Holder (D-Gitmo, ACLU) made the call to have the DoJ handle this---leading right to the Undiebomber lawyering up before we find out about the other undiebombers. Asshat Brennan (Cheney's future bitch) said" Just because somebody is going to be put into the criminal legal process doesn't mean we don't have other opportunities to get information from him". I ask you, do you think we would get more information out of him via the Cheney method or the ACLU method?

Selena Zito notices the Surrendercrats!

Selena points out just how inept our current Dem leadership is. "A complete failure when it comes to a commander-in-chief’s most important job: Protecting Americans from harm." "It all contributed to an impression of an administration unprepared to deal with a security threat or a real crisis"

How many Americans will die because of the misguided extreme-left nature of the government we have (NOT the one we were promised pre-election by the DMC. You know, the one where Obambi=Reagan?) Is there anything we can do to protect ourselves better? Take the House and Senate in 2010 and send Obambi home in 2012.

New poll shows "D" label is less popular. Wonder why?

Rasmussen, the most accurate polling organizations shows a HUGE drop in the number of Dems. "Number of Democrats Falls to New Low, Down Six Points Since Election 2008" Why would people run away from the Dems now? Could it be because they now can see the duplicitous, unserious nature of the current Dem leadership? That they now wonder if Dems would rather please the ACLU and CAIR than protect the American people? Ayup.

WAPO pumps up Obambi as tough: Soft on terror? Not this president

As usual, the editors go to bat for the Won! Obambi is so awesomely awesome when it comes to protecting our nation! And those eevil Pubs are just trying to make it political! No need to consider if the Pubs are, you know, correct. We can't look at the substance, we can only turn it into another issue that is political! Another fine example from the Democrat-Media Complex (DMC) of how easy it is to coordinate your output with the Obamanauts. PS: How heavy is the water you constantly carry for the Dems? Are hernias covered by Obamacare?

"Mr. Obama's actions -- often at the cost of enraging his party's liberal base -- have also demonstrated tenacity and pragmatism blended with a necessary reassessment of the flawed policies of his predecessors and a recommitment to the rule of law." Why would his liberal base not want to protect the nation from attack? Why is the 'rule of law' a recomitment? DUH!

Giving "Big" Dick Cheney a new opening!

Politico headline: Brennan: Cheney may be 'ignorant' of terror facts
How soon before Cheney fires off a response to this idiocy? Seriously, LOL. I mean questioning him on his anti-terrorism cred? As the great Jim Geraghty said 12/30/09 in this post: Ah Yes, That Dainty, Sensitive, Dovish Dick Cheney We've Heard So Much About
" Just to clarify, this is the same former vice president who we were told was Darth Vader, ruthless and cruel, obsessed with terrorism, draconian and lacking in perspective, stopping at nothing to find anyone who could be even remotely connected to al-Qaeda and using excruciatingly painful forms of interrogation that leave decent souls traumatized and Jack Bauer wincing.

And now we're supposed to believe he's insufficiently interested in condemning the attackers? He's beyond condemning him; he wants to waterboard him until his lungs qualify for a federal wetlands status."

Yeah, Obambi, good call for an attack line!