Funny web comments on the Brown race

I rarely read comments for on-line articles, but I have been for the MA election. It is truly astounding how comments run pro-Brown even at sites likes Boston.com and Politico and thehill.com. When I last looked a few years ago, comments at those site were unhinged Bushitler crap so it is quite a change. I did find some gems I'd like to share.

As the great Jules Crittenden says, some of the comments might be considered hurtful.
*****
Democrats. A sense of entitlement. They do not serve us. They are royalty. And they certainly don't have to demean themselves to converse with the unwashed masses. If left up to them, elections would not exist, and we would have a "green job".... pulling their rickshaws. Ouch!
******
Vice President Joe Biden mentioned today that he ran into his good friend from Katie's diner, wheelchair Chuck, at Home Depot today, and they were discussing what a shame it was that Curt Schilling was a Yankees Fan, instead of the team he played for, the Boston Braves.
That has gotta hurt!
*****
One thing for sure, if Martha wins, no southern or Appalachian state that are the unfortunate and unfounded recipients of jokes regarding their citizen intelligence, will ever have to hear those jokes again. Massachusetts will deservedly take their place.
Painful as a Tyson bite.
*****
She should have run for the seat in the 57th state
More hurt. What does that mean? /sarc
*****
http://www.breitbart.tv/massachusetts-miracle-video-sets-stakes-for-tuesdays-election/
A fine viral video.
*****
It makes perfect sense that the pivotal moment for the Tea Party movement would occur in Boston. It is beautiful historical symmetry. If Brown wins, Boston Harbor re-affirms its status as a national symbol for the latest struggle to shake off tyranny in our own time.
Is he clinging to a bible and guns? He might be very hurtful.
*****
Hail fellow Patriots. Well met.
The Chicago Machine is coming! The Chicago Machine is coming! Don\'t vote until you see the White House in their eyes! The Red Coakley\'s are coming! The Red Coakley\'s are coming! Be prepared to drop your plows mid-furrow January 19! Vote for the Scott heard \'round the world! No reform without representation!
Yowza! How could they say that about the Obamacrocy? Fervor can be hurtful.
*****

Posting is tough

I am such a consumer of information, it makes it tough to get it all together and, you know, post!

Well, what is happening up in Kennedyville is truly amazing. Spectacularly awesome and awesomely spectacular.

And now Obambi is visiting?? He thinks he is still a game-changer?

What a mistake as Coakley is toast!

I will try and actually, you know, post on this. Who knows, I might even get some linky-love from someone important (i.e. someone with any hits!)

CIA turns on Obambi

Uh-hoh. If they CIA turns on you, the leaks will never stop, right, Dubya?

Name "Big" Dick Cheney as Anti-Jihad Czar

Who better to tighten Jihadi and Twelver sphincters than Big Dick? Name him as the Plenipotentiary for Jihad reduction activites and provide complete authority to take any action he so desires. Someone in the current Admin needs to have balls and it seems Michelle has Obambi's under lock-and-key.

Althouse spanks NYT!

I generally enjoy Ann's posts and found a good one here. She has such snark!

"I'm just noticing this NYT editorial from New Year's Day. It's not bad generally, but I just don't get the "absurdly." What's absurd about accusing Obama of being weak on national security?

I used to subscribe to the NYT and read it for at least an hour a day, paging through the whole thing. Now, I'm spending more and more time looking for opinion about American politics in the British papers. For example, the UK Telegraph has "Barack Obama is vulnerable on terror – and he knows it."

So, weakness on national security: too absurd to mention or something Obama knows all too well?"

Heh

Kristol Krushes Obambi on Security

Caught this @ Newsbusters by Mark: "as to Brennan's claim that there was no "smoking gun" regarding Abdul Mutallab: "He is the smoking gun," going on to detail all the red flags surrounding him. "Frankly, for Mr. Brennan to say, well, no smoking gun, that itself shows a kind of not-serious-about-the-war mentality."The Weekly Standard editor wasn't through . . .

• "Closing the embassy in Yemen last night? No one wants State Department officials put at risk, but that is a sign of weakness. Closing the embassy? We can't protect our own embassy in Yemen, a place where we have special operations forces. A place we say we're working with the government on the front lines of the war on terror? And there's a terror threat, and we close the embassy?"

Nice catch, Mark!

Dems will get more American murdered by Jihadis.

Selena Zito notices the Surrendercrats!

Selena points out just how inept our current Dem leadership is. "A complete failure when it comes to a commander-in-chief’s most important job: Protecting Americans from harm." "It all contributed to an impression of an administration unprepared to deal with a security threat or a real crisis"

How many Americans will die because of the misguided extreme-left nature of the government we have (NOT the one we were promised pre-election by the DMC. You know, the one where Obambi=Reagan?) Is there anything we can do to protect ourselves better? Take the House and Senate in 2010 and send Obambi home in 2012.

New poll shows "D" label is less popular. Wonder why?

Rasmussen, the most accurate polling organizations shows a HUGE drop in the number of Dems. "Number of Democrats Falls to New Low, Down Six Points Since Election 2008" Why would people run away from the Dems now? Could it be because they now can see the duplicitous, unserious nature of the current Dem leadership? That they now wonder if Dems would rather please the ACLU and CAIR than protect the American people? Ayup.

Obambi is skeered!

As the local paper points out, Obambi is staying close to Manly Marines.

And the reasons are probably as much security-conscious as symbolic for a wartime commander in chief from the Democratic Party.

"The military tends to be more right wing, conservative leaning, and there's a bias when you have a Democratic, liberal president," said Michael Naho'opi'i, who graduated from the Naval Academy in 1986, retired as a lieutenant commander and is now executive director of the Kahoolawe Island Reserve Commission. "A lot of it has to do with security. But it does show that he supports the troops."

Yeah, Obambi is skeered and the supports the troops when they are protecting him. Otherwise, not so much.

Obambi is a submissive bitch

Obambi presents himself to our foes, those evil men (uhh, no, NOT 'pubs) as a whiny, weak, little submissive bitch. He bows to potentates and dictators. He insults his own nation. He thinks he can convince our enemies to do what is NOT in their interest. His approach is that of a 'comminuty organizer', but he seems to not quite realize that the Mad Mullahs ain't the same as settling a conflict between the Crips and Bloods.

His manner and approach invites challenges from enemies. Remember OBL's comments about the strong horse and the weak horse? Well, Dubya was a strong horse and Obambi is a weak horse. Dubya could garner fear from our enemies, a valuable lever. Remember when Libya gave up it's WMD programs days after 4ID plucked Saddam from his spider hole? Uh, yeah. Who fears Obambi? No one important.

Our enemies have looked and see they can have their way with Obambi. Watch out world!

PS: Hunker down and buy more ammo!